A consumer complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is a document the Act itself defines. What it has to contain, who may present it, which Commission it goes to and how long there is to bring it are all set by the statute rather than by convention. This page sets out that format, element by element, with the provision each element rests on.
Section 2(6) of the Act defines a complaint as an allegation in writing, made by a complainant, that one of six things has happened. A grievance falling outside that definition is not a complaint under this Act, whatever else it may be — which is the first thing that decides whether this format applies at all.
The six matters the Act lists are:
Section 69 bars a Commission from admitting a complaint brought more than two years after the date on which the cause of action arose. A Commission may condone a delay beyond that period, but only by recording its reasons for doing so — so the two-year point is the date the rest of the format is measured against.
The two years run from the date the cause of action arose, which is not always the date of purchase. Where a defect appears later, or a service is refused later, that is a different and later date.
Two questions decide the Commission: how much the claim is worth, and where the complaint may be presented. They are answered by different provisions and a complaint has to satisfy both.
The value used is the consideration paid or agreed to be paid — not the compensation sought. On that measure the ladder runs:
These figures are not the ones printed in the Act. Sections 34, 47 and 58 as enacted read ₹1 crore and ₹10 crore; the provisos to those sections were exercised by the Consumer Protection (Jurisdiction of the District Commission, the State Commission and the National Commission) Rules, 2021 (G.S.R. 912(E), 30 December 2021), which substituted the figures above. Published copies of the bare Act still show the old limits, and the District boundary in particular moved by a factor of two.
Territorial jurisdiction is set by Section 34(2) for the District Commission and, in identical words, by Section 47(4) for the State Commission. Four grounds are available:
The fourth ground — where the complainant lives — is new in the 2019 Act and is the one most often missed. Under the 1986 Act a complaint generally followed the opposite party; it no longer has to.
The Act sets out the stages a proved complaint passes through. The form the document takes and the manner of presenting it are set by rules made under the Act and by the practice of the Commission it goes to, which vary — so what follows is the statutory shape, not a local procedure.
Section 39(1) lists what a District Commission may order where a complaint is proved — among them removing the defect, replacing the goods, returning the price paid, and paying compensation for loss or injury suffered. The Act states what a Commission may order; it does not state what a complaint has to ask for.
The Act prescribes no list of documents. What follows is what such complaints carry, because the allegation has to rest on something a Commission can read.
What follows is the set of elements a complaint under the Act contains, each with the provision requiring it. It is a description of the document, not a template to copy — the form a complaint is presented in is set by rules made under the Act and by the practice of the Commission it goes to.
Not established here: the form a complaint is presented in, and the fee payable on presenting it. Both are set by rules made under the Act, and the rule prescribing the fee has been substituted more than once since 2020. No figure is published on this page for that reason.
Generate your complaint in 2 minutes
NyayaMithran is a pre-consultation analyser, not a substitute for an advocate, and nothing on this page is legal advice.